Comparison of prognosis between gastric ESD and surgery

Fukunaga and Nagami headshotsPost written by Shusei Fukunaga, MD, PhD and  Yasuaki Nagami, MD, PhD from the Department of Gastroenterology at Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine in Osaka.

Our study focused on the long-term outcomes, risk factors for mortality, and adverse events for patients with expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgical treatments. Although ESD for expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC has been widely accepted, no prospective randomized study has been conducted on this subject. Moreover, randomized control trials are ethically difficult to conduct because of the significant differences in treatment invasiveness. Thus, we conducted the present study using a propensity-matched analysis to reduce the selection bias because the relationship between mortality and therapeutic method could be affected by various confounding factors.

Fukunaga and Nagami Table 5

After propensity-score matching, the 5-year overall survival rate was higher in the ESD group than in the surgery group. We also found that surgery was significantly associated with mortality using both the IPTW method, and Cox analysis. Significantly fewer adverse events were associated with ESD than with surgery. No cause-specific mortality was observed in either group. Moreover, the sub-analysis of the study revealed that the ESD group showed a significantly longer survival than the surgery group in patients with a poor American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), though the long-term outcomes of ESD in patients with ASA-PS 1 were comparable to those of surgery.

Fukunaga and Nagami Figure 2

Our results indicate that ESD might be an alternative treatment modality for expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC because of its favorable long-term outcomes without severe adverse events compared with those of surgery.

Fukunaga and Nagami Figure 3

Find the article abstract here.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s