Management and risk factor of stenosis after ESD for colorectal neoplasms

Kudo_Hayashi_headshotPost written by Takemasa Hayashi, MD, from the Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

This study focuses on the incidence of stenosis and its relationship with the clinicopathological factors in surveillance. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms can reduce the need for unnecessary surgery. Large mucosal lesions should be removed endoscopically. I felt it was necessary to clarify the risk of stenosis after ESD for large lesions.

Circumferential mucosal defect of more than 90% is a significant risk factor for stenosis after colorectal ESD. Surveillance endoscopy 6 months after ESD is recommended to assess for development of stenosis. Defects smaller than 90% do not require close endoscopic follow-up or prophylactic measures for prevention of post-ESD stenosis. After endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms, stenosis risk is very low compared to other digestive organs. Early surveillance after endoscopic treatment will increase detection of stenosis. The sufficient interval between treatment and surveillance provide the time for narrow lumen to dilate naturally with bowel movement and feces. Kudo_figFind the article abstract here.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s