Colorectal cancer patients advocating screening to their siblings: a randomized behavioral intervention

Post written by Ker-Kan Tan, PhD, from the Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore. 

Tan_photo

The aim of this study was twofold. First, we sought to understand if colorectal cancer (CRC) patients would be willing to advocate cancer screening to their siblings (who would be considered higher-risk, first-degree relatives [FDRs]). Second, we wanted to evaluate if siblings would be more willing to undergo cancer screening if made aware of the national screening guidelines for FDRs of CRC patients.

FDRs of CRC patients are known to have an estimated 2-times-higher lifetime risk of developing CRC compared to the general average-risk population, due to family history. However, we noted that few interventions specifically targeting FDRs’ awareness and willingness to screen for CRC were in place, whether in Singapore or around the world.

We also realized that, although it seemed intuitive that CRC patients would encourage their FDRs to go for screening, this assumption was unsupported in our previous research.

We therefore sought to conduct a randomized controlled, behavioral trial to see if patients would be willing advocates of screening to their FDRs, and whether an education intervention package tailored for FDRs would be significantly more effective in encouraging FDRs to contact us for CRC screening.

We found that CRC patients, regardless of being assigned to intervention or control groups, were highly willing (approximately 90% of sample) to advocate CRC screening to their FDRs. However, although FDRs who received the tailored intervention package were more likely to respond or contact us, overall FDR response rates were low (14.3%). We also found that FDRs who were aged 60 years or older were significantly less likely to contact us.

We felt that the study highlighted CRC patients as a potential avenue to spread awareness about CRC screening to their friends and loved ones. However, the low FDR response rate suggests that patient-led advocacy should be used as a complementary adjunct in a multi-pronged suite of screening promotion modalities.

Tan_figure

CONSORT flow diagram.

Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s