Single-pass 1-needle actuation versus single-pass 3-needle actuation technique for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling

Post written by David L. Diehl, MD, FACP, FASGE, from the Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Diehl_headshot

The focus of this study is to further refine the optimal method for EUS-guided liver biopsy. Some reports in the literature utilize a single pass, single-needle throw for obtaining a liver biopsy specimen. However, often there is only a 2-4 cm trajectory of safe needle passage for biopsy. While longer needle throws can obtain longer liver cores, longer passes are sometimes not possible. This study set out to determine if multiple to-and-fro movements of the needle yield more usable liver cores than a single throw.

We used what is currently accepted as the optimal biopsy needle (19G FNB needle) as well as wet suction, which has outperformed dry suction in multiple studies. We prospectively randomized patients undergoing EUS-LB to one pass, single-needle throw (one to-and-fro) to one pass, 3 needle throws. A power analysis found that 40 subjects should be entered into the study: 20 in the 1:3 and 20 in the 1:1.

We found that 3 needle throws yielded more good liver cores than a single throw. The important metrics that were used were number of complete portal triads (CPTs), aggregate specimen length (ASL), and length of the longest piece (LLP). The LLP was comparable between 1 and 3 needle actuations, but CPT and ASL were significantly higher with 3.

There is no need to worry if you cannot find a needle trajectory without blood vessels longer than 2-3 cm. Find a safe trajectory and move the needle back and forth 3 times, instead of a single time. If you are using a 19G FNB needle with wet suction, your yield should be good.

Diehl_fig

Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s