Optimal stent placement strategy for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Hu_headshot Post written by Bing Hu, MD, PhD, from the Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Yangpu District, and the Department of Gastroenterology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Jiading District, Shanghai, China.

We compared, for the first time, 4 major stenting modalities simultaneously to determine an optimal strategy for the palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) unsuitable for surgery. Endoscopic management of MHBO remains extremely challenging without universal consensus. Our results will help to develop evidence-based guidelines in the future.

From 4 tertiary centers, 633 inoperable MHBO patients who received successfully endoscopic stenting were identified and classified into 4 groups: bilateral metal stent (BMS), unilateral metal stent (UMS), bilateral plastic stent (BPS), and unilateral plastic stent (UPS) placement. After statistical matching to control potential confounders, we found that patients in the BMS group had the highest clinical success rate, the lowest incidence of cholangitis, the least numbers of re-interventions, and the longest stent patency and survival durations. The patients in the UMS group were inferior to those in BMS group but superior to those using plastic stents. So, we recommended that if technically possible, the priority should be given to dual metal stent, followed by single metal stent placement. Our findings may aid in the clinical decision-making process and allow physicians to offer the most suitable treatment for this complex patient population.

Although a change in strategy for biliary drainage can improve survival in MHBO, the median OS was only 2.7-7.1 months with stenting alone in this study. Some additional therapies, such radiofrequency ablation or photodynamic therapy, deserve more studies to further improve the survival benefits in this patient population.


Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s