Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Post written by Vivek Kumbhari, MD, and Lea Fayad, MD, from the Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Kumbhari_headshot

Our study compared 2 weight-loss procedures, the commonly performed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and the newly introduced, minimally invasive endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG).

The LSG has excellent weight-loss outcomes but, as an elective procedure, remains associated with adverse events which are disconcerting and make it less desirable to patients. New-onset gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a particular concern that has been associated with LSG. Additionally, a small proportion of those eligible for bariatric surgery opt for this therapy due to fear of complication and reluctance to undergo surgery. This leaves a large unmet need that could be addressed with minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG).

At the 6 months of follow-up, the percent total body weight loss was lower in the ESG group (17.1% ± 6.5%) compared with the LSG group (23.6% ± 7.6%). However, ESG patients had significantly lower rates of adverse events (5.2% vs 16.9%, P< .05). New-onset GERD was also significantly lower in the ESG group compared with the LSG group (1.9% vs 14.5%, P<.05).

Despite similar restriction in size in both procedures, the difference in weight loss outcomes remains to be explained and is likely related to the excision of the gastric mucosa in the LSG. Further prospective research must look into the physiologic differences that contribute to weight loss and to the development of GERD after these 2 procedures.

april_kumbhari_final.eps

Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s