Incremental diagnostic yield of chromoendoscopy in IBD

Deepak_headshotParakkal Deepak, MBBS, from the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, in Rochester, Minnesota, USA discusses “Incremental diagnostic yield of chromoendoscopy and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients with a history of colorectal dysplasia on white-light endoscopy.”

The focus of our study was to evaluate whether initial and subsequent chromoendoscopy (CE) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a history of colorectal dysplasia detects additional dysplastic lesions that were not seen on the index colonoscopy with standard or high-definition (HD) white-light endoscopy (WLE). In addition, we sought to explore whether such findings influenced the management of these patients. The recent SCENIC guidelines suggested CE rather than WLE for initial dysplasia surveillance in IBD patients. However, there is limited data on the yield of initial and subsequent CE in the group of patients with a history of dysplasia on WLE and its impact on management plans.

Deepak_fig

 

In our study, the first CE identified dysplasia in 59 of the 95 patients. The first CE was 19 times more likely to detect flat dysplasia and 93% less likely to miss dysplasia compared with index WLE. The majority of the lesions detected at the first CE were removed endoscopically, most commonly located in the cecum/ascending colon. A subsequent CE was performed in 44 patients with new dysplasia detected in 20 patients.

Our study shows that CE is better than WLE at detecting flat dysplasia in IBD patients. It is also less likely to miss dysplasia. Additionally, most of the visualized dysplastic lesions during CE can be resected at the time of endoscopy. The importance of continued surveillance with CE is shown in our study where subsequent CE detected new dysplastic lesions including detecting multifocal low grade dysplasia that resulted in surgery. The majority of lesions were resected during endoscopy though 5 patients were referred for surgery due to multifocal dysplasia detected on CE.

A next step would be to continue to follow this cohort to better understand if new lesions continue to be detected at subsequent CE and if there is a survival benefit. Also, a separate study would be to look at the patients who did not have dysplasia at the time of the 2nd CE to see if they do develop dysplasia on future examinations. This might help us identify patients who may benefit from infrequent screening with CE.

Find the abstract online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s