Mucosal healing in IBD

Parambir S. Dulai, MBBS, from the University of California San Diego in San Diego, California, USA discusses this review article “Assessment of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: review.”

Within this review article we have compared diagnostic tools currently available for the assessment of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease, and we have outlined the ideal approach to integrating these tools into clinical trials and clinical practice.

Mucosal healing has become an important treatment target in inflammatory bowel disease and achieving complete mucosal healing has been associated with substantial reductions in short (symptom activity, steroid withdrawal), and long-term (hospitalization, surgery, colon cancer) disease related complications. The incorporation of this outcome in routine practice is growing, but It can be difficult at times for providers to understand the advantages, disadvantages, and considerations to be made when using and interpreting these tools. This may lead to inefficient monitoring of disease activity which carries implications on the impact the disease may have on patient outcomes and health care resource utilization.

Figure 1. Approach to assessing mucosal healing in clinical practice. MRE, magnetic resonance enterography; CTE, CT enterography; DAE, device assisted enteroscopy; VCE, video capsule endoscopy. Persistent lesion is defined as one that remains identifiable despite significant changes in treatment and an objective clinical improvement in disease activity.

Endoscopy remains the gold standard for disease assessment but the use of non-invasive tools (i.e. MRI) is likely to increase over time, particularly in patients with endoscopically inaccessible inflammation. Providers should be cautioned, however, that the presence of mucosal lesions cannot be reliably excluded based on cross sectional imaging alone, and further small-bowel endoscopy should be considered in all symptomatic patients. Video capsule endoscopy or device-assisted enteroscopy can be used, with device-assisted enteroscopy being preferred in stricturing Crohn’s disease because of the risk of capsule retention or in patients in whom small-bowel malignancy is a possibility. Ultimately, irrespective of the diagnostic tool used, it is the frequent repeated assessment over time with changes in therapy until mucosal healing is achieved that remains the cornerstone of a treat to target algorithm.

Read the abstract for this article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s