EUS-guided drainage of a pelvic abscess

Post written by Ignacio Fernández-Urién, MD, PhD, from the Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Fernandez_headshot

We presented the case of a 50-year-old woman with an 8-cm pelvic abscess secondary to an acute diverticulitis that was drained guided by EUS. First, we punctured the lesion with a 19-gauge needle, and 5 mL of purulent material was obtained and sent for culture. Then, an 8-mm × 8-mm LAMS (Hot Axios; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) was deployed, and complete resolution of the abscess was achieved 3 weeks later.

The approach to those collections located at the pelvic area is usually percutaneous and guided by ultrasonography or CT scan. However, they may present a clinical challenge for physicians because their location is usually surrounded by the pelvis, urinary bladder, rectum, prostate, vagina and/or uterus. On the other hand, depending on the selected route, some patients may experience pain and discomfort at the puncture site. This is more frequent with the transvaginal approach but can also happen with the transabdominal and transgluteal approaches.

EUS-guided drainage of pelvic collections offers the possibility of using a trans-rectal approach which has 3 important advantages compared to percutaneous approaches: I) pelvic collections are often close to the rectum, so there are no organs between collections and the echoendoscope; II) trans-rectal stents are not painful or uncomfortable; III) trans-rectal approach allows us to deploy stents with greater diameters than percutaneous catheters resulting in a more efficient and faster resolution of lesions. Despite its advantages, only a few cases of LAMS in pelvic lesions have been previously published.

EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses and/or collections is simple, efficient, and safe for patients. In our opinion, EUS-guided drainage should be taken into account as a first-line therapeutic option in this clinical scenario.

Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s