Pathology definitions and resection strategies for early colorectal neoplasia

Post written by Makoto Nishimura, MD, from the Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nishimura_headshot

Well-known discrepancies exist between the East and West classifications of colorectal neoplasia. For example, ‘intra-mucosal carcinoma’ in Japan is recognized as ‘high-grade dysplasia’ in the U.S. To resolve these interobserver discrepancies between pathologists, an international meeting was conducted, and the result corresponding to the agreement among pathologists was published as the Vienna classification (revised in 2000). Even with this classification system, pathology definitions and resection strategies have been different in the East and West. In this article, we have updated the similarities and differences in the Eastern and Western approaches to early colorectal neoplasia and its treatment strategies.

Even in the post-Vienna era, there were differences in the pathology definitions and management of early colorectal neoplasms. Therefore, experts from the East and West gathered and discussed bridging these differences.

Pathological classifications are different in the East and West for early colorectal neoplasms. For example, the T1 category is further divided into T1a/ T1b in Japan based on the depth of submucosal invasion and risk of lymph node metastasis (Table 3). On the contrary, there is no subgroup classification of the T1 category in the U.S. (Table 4); therefore, the endoscopic approach for submucosal cancer is different in both regions.

The Vienna/revised Vienna classification facilitated an understanding between the Eastern and Western approaches in constituting and formulating a unified guideline. Further efforts should focus on the harmonization of histopathologic diagnoses and the standardization of endoscopic management between the East and West.

Nishimura

Read the full article online.

The information presented in Endoscopedia reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). ASGE expressly disclaims any warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, and is not liable for damages of any kind in connection with the material, information, or procedures set forth.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s